23-02-2006, 04:52 PM
And FSP is like Dan. It don't listen to ATC either!
The great suggestions topic....
|
23-02-2006, 04:52 PM
And FSP is like Dan. It don't listen to ATC either!
23-02-2006, 05:11 PM
Quote:WBHoenig wrote: Is this a "It it not posible and will never be" or a "It is not possible, but if enough user want this and Dan has some time left..." ?
23-02-2006, 07:15 PM
my great suggestion from the other thread...
of have pilots hours recorded in real time. eg if you fly a 3 hour flight, in real time, you get 3 hours logged if you fly the flight with time acceleration, and it takes you 40minutes, you only get 40 minutes logged
23-02-2006, 07:34 PM
Quote:vrapp wrote: I also would like this change. I recently did a 3+ hour flight. About 12 minutes into the flight, some turbalance hit, and satisfaction was down -2% for the next 3 hours, even though the rest of the flight was smooth and steady. Luckily, the music at the end of the flight brought the satisfaction rating up to 100%. PS: maybe I should add in this thread... maybe some more interaction between pilot and co-pilot, if that is common in real life in GA planes . Or maybe in GA planes only-- for the passengers to make some comments. Thanks
24-02-2006, 12:25 AM
maybe, they could announce where you are going, like when you enter the destinasion, and the Pilots name, maybe it could say.
welcome abord, on our nonstop sevice to (whatever you type in), your captian today will be (your pilots name). And also at the end instead of saying "thankyou for flying teith us" they could say "tahnkyou for flying with (your airline name). OOOOO. i'am getting better, i got away from FS2004 general, and General aviation Fourms, to FSP support
Michael Ward
Private Pilot ASEL Instrument Student
26-02-2006, 11:38 PM
If there was "go around", don't penalize for not having sufficient fuel reserves upon landing. Probably could be implemented as some
special announcement.
Vadim Rapp
27-02-2006, 04:21 AM
I've always wanted to have a copilot that can handle the ATC communication for me (for whatever reason ) well, a real world captain
gives the communication to his copilot, and he also can go to the toilet without having to "pause" the airplane
R. Galih Prasetya
01-03-2006, 07:30 PM
YAAAA, I would love that.
Here is my idea, maybe you could have special flights, like for instance you could do a special VIP trip for a famous Celeberty and he could being extra money for the whole aircraft, or You have anniverserys for your airline.
Michael Ward
Private Pilot ASEL Instrument Student
04-03-2006, 11:29 PM
1. stewardess shouldn't announce end of flight if during the taxi after landing I have stopped (before ccrossing a runway, for instance), if I keep the belt sign on.
2. Often in clouds, FS gets confused about the speed, it begins jumping up and down. FSP shouldn't penalize for exceeding 250 speed limit if that happens.
Vadim Rapp
05-03-2006, 12:53 AM
Quote:vrapp wrote: As already posted: this will only happen if you apply the parking brake.
05-03-2006, 04:58 PM
1. When entering the destination, enter not flight time but arrival time, as well as departure time. I think arriving at certain time is the main goal real passengers are interested in: connected flights and such.
2. If departure time is specified, penalize for closing the doors too early. Also: instead of "x passengers are waiting on the ground", have "x tickets were sold"; not all of them may board however, introduce some random non-coming; the goal is to close the doors at the exact time. The random factor of non-coming can depend on some factors like time of day (more non-coming at rush hours, for example), also for dangerous zones it probably would be higher, etc. 3. (2) may be further extended by allowing to overbook X% of the tickets in Company Manager, like real companies do. Overbooked too little -> several pax did not come, not full load, loss of revenue. Overbooked too many -> unhappy customers and monetary compensation, say, ticket price x2. 4. Add real (not FS) GMT and real time of the flight to the flight log. May be handy when flying online with the requirement to file PIREP later. Post Edited ( 03-05-06 16:59 )
Vadim Rapp
05-03-2006, 05:00 PM
Quote:DBE wrote: yes, it will, so what? see for example http://atcsl.tripod.com/Flight_Operation.htm : "Taxi to departure runway - set parking brake when holding short of runway " Post Edited ( 03-05-06 17:06 )
Vadim Rapp
06-03-2006, 11:52 PM
A) Extra points for a visual approach/landing as opposed to an ILS approach/landing. A visual approach takes a bit more skill - even
more so in inclement weather. B) Some way to stock up on food and drink for very long (12+ hours) flights. As it stands now, your cabin crew runs out of hot meals/sandwiches/drinks after giving the passengers 3 of each meal and after 4 drinks. As a result, you usually have a passenger opinion somewhere around 75% when landing in Sydney, Australia after flying there from North America. BTW, Mr. Rapp. FS9 does not get "confused" in clouds. It reflects what sometimes happens - especially in turbulent weather - in the real world. Rapid changes in wind direction and speed are reflected on your airspeed indicator. An easy (and realistic) solution is to fly just above your safe no flaps airspeed (210ias or so in most medium and large jets) until reaching 10,000 and then lower the nose to accelerate to 30 or so knots below your aircraft's max ias (Vne) speed. Alternatively, you can ask for clearance to exceed 250 from ATC (CTRL+SHFT+3)
03-04-2006, 06:10 PM
Hy ,
I´m a new guy here and this is my thrid post but I would really like the following added to FSP: The map for the flights can show the flights selected by either pilot. I would like to show the flight legs by selecting the plane. That would be a great improvement in my eyes. See you, Paddy. PS.: Really good suggestions up here in this topic
Greetings to all Airliners
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|