30-08-2005, 05:28 PM
at Phil!I think it means the percentage of flights that landed succesfully. Not the number of PAX that made it off alive! That would be awful!
Thread Rating:
|
98.43% safety record - not THAT bad..
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[-]](http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/images/collapse.png)
| Messages In This Thread |
|
98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by DanSteph - 29-08-2005, 07:27 PM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by SaVas - 29-08-2005, 08:45 PM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by Ryanamur - 29-08-2005, 08:47 PM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by mach_one_man - 29-08-2005, 09:51 PM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by jboweruk - 29-08-2005, 09:56 PM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by DanSteph - 30-08-2005, 04:56 AM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by SWAFO - 30-08-2005, 05:28 PM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by Ryanamur - 30-08-2005, 06:19 PM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by DanSteph - 30-08-2005, 10:47 PM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by jboweruk - 31-08-2005, 08:31 AM
Re: 98.43% safety record - not THAT bad.. - by SWAFO - 31-08-2005, 03:34 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)