26-01-2010, 10:49 AM
I use both simultaneously. AH to plan flights and the business model and FSPax for loading, cockpit environment, potential failures and
the cool trick of typing in AP changes quickly. They work seamlessly together.
The best part is now Dan has written in a nerf in case a third party program causes a failure. FSPax senses the failed system, knows it
didn't do it, and doesn't penalize you for reacting to it appropriately. Nice touch Dan.
Edit: Didn't notice, this was post #800. As if anyone cares, including me.
Post Edited ( 01-27-10 12:29 )
the cool trick of typing in AP changes quickly. They work seamlessly together.
The best part is now Dan has written in a nerf in case a third party program causes a failure. FSPax senses the failed system, knows it
didn't do it, and doesn't penalize you for reacting to it appropriately. Nice touch Dan.
Edit: Didn't notice, this was post #800. As if anyone cares, including me.

Post Edited ( 01-27-10 12:29 )
![[Image: vpa401.png]](http://www.virtualpilots.org/public/images/signatures/vpa401.png)
Charlie don't surf!