26-05-2009, 05:02 PM
I purchased this for fsx over the weekend, I think its generally a great light twin product.Great panel (no 2D though). Seems a little too over
eager to liftoff at stall speeds (fully loaded to MTOW).Needs holding down quite a bit to 100kts before rotation. The coupled AP works well
above 8000ft. e.g. going to EGLL 27R via BIG. I use the AP from 25,000ft down to 9,000ft(ie wait for passing BIG VOR and turn) before
disconnecting AP NAV,VS,ALT. Frankly I feel happier flying it by hand from there to the tarmac. Also I noticed that when using a weather
addon (ASA) I got a correct MP of 30inches, when trimmed for cruise as opposed to 26 inches(25,000ft,29.92) without a weather program.
So I guess ASA is a must with this. Also a yoke n pedals, and a quadrant are highly recommended, and make it a pleasure. It beats the
default MS Baron 58 model by a mile, but apart from a couple of annoying bugs its almost but not quite for light twins the PMDG-MD11 of
the heavy jet world. My main thought though, and the point of the post after the literary diarrhoea above, is would it be possible to include
pressurisation failures as part of FSP with say a 10minute lag time from initial notification, for the airplane to dive to 12,000ft. Since
altitude detection seems to work for lights, barometer points scoring etc, A small routine would be possible?
The other matter is demand for it. Does anyone else like the idea or have any better ideas?
Screenies to follow in the screenies post.
eager to liftoff at stall speeds (fully loaded to MTOW).Needs holding down quite a bit to 100kts before rotation. The coupled AP works well
above 8000ft. e.g. going to EGLL 27R via BIG. I use the AP from 25,000ft down to 9,000ft(ie wait for passing BIG VOR and turn) before
disconnecting AP NAV,VS,ALT. Frankly I feel happier flying it by hand from there to the tarmac. Also I noticed that when using a weather
addon (ASA) I got a correct MP of 30inches, when trimmed for cruise as opposed to 26 inches(25,000ft,29.92) without a weather program.
So I guess ASA is a must with this. Also a yoke n pedals, and a quadrant are highly recommended, and make it a pleasure. It beats the
default MS Baron 58 model by a mile, but apart from a couple of annoying bugs its almost but not quite for light twins the PMDG-MD11 of
the heavy jet world. My main thought though, and the point of the post after the literary diarrhoea above, is would it be possible to include
pressurisation failures as part of FSP with say a 10minute lag time from initial notification, for the airplane to dive to 12,000ft. Since
altitude detection seems to work for lights, barometer points scoring etc, A small routine would be possible?
The other matter is demand for it. Does anyone else like the idea or have any better ideas?
Screenies to follow in the screenies post.