08-08-2005, 03:46 AM
Dan and Staff:
Well, to be honest, FS Pax didn't really knock me through the wall like many other people.
The fact that it had to modify the Flight One ATR aircraft configuration with respect to weight stations doesn't make sense to me. Since I
only did a demo flight, I really couldn't tell if what FS Pax changed had an impact. Although the indicated airspeed on taxi seemed
significently lower than the outside visuals.. Maybe it was me???
I posted the FS Pax warning on the ATR forum to see what the ATR folks think of modifying the ATR A/C config file.
I am going to pass on purchasing it and wait for FS2Crew.
One thing I would change right away, is take some of the functionality off of the pulldown menus and create a panel button set. It was
annoying to have to stop the sim and select the FS Pax options.
Anyway Dan, good job. The passenger, cargo, and fuel loading feature of the program was very well done. But this add-on just isn't for
me.
Take care!
Barry
Well, to be honest, FS Pax didn't really knock me through the wall like many other people.
The fact that it had to modify the Flight One ATR aircraft configuration with respect to weight stations doesn't make sense to me. Since I
only did a demo flight, I really couldn't tell if what FS Pax changed had an impact. Although the indicated airspeed on taxi seemed
significently lower than the outside visuals.. Maybe it was me???
I posted the FS Pax warning on the ATR forum to see what the ATR folks think of modifying the ATR A/C config file.
I am going to pass on purchasing it and wait for FS2Crew.
One thing I would change right away, is take some of the functionality off of the pulldown menus and create a panel button set. It was
annoying to have to stop the sim and select the FS Pax options.
Anyway Dan, good job. The passenger, cargo, and fuel loading feature of the program was very well done. But this add-on just isn't for
me.
Take care!
Barry