RIDICULOUS!

[Jetflyer]

For long flights you need to sort this the L out.

20 hr flight.
3 lots of meals
Flight attendants (on auto mode) are serving endless drinks (where did they all come from?)
"Normal" people only need to eat 3 times a day. These passengers are "very hungry" to the extent of 02%
satisfaction and most laughably, the
status of their opinion on my flight is now "fear and desperation". So they are desperate and terrifide on a flight
where nothing has gone wrong, they
have had a smooth flight with plenty of food and drink, and if the flight attendants served too much drinks they
wouldn't drink it all if they had any
sense. What's more, the passengers should clearly reaslise the flight it long and also normal people wouldn't be
very hungry after 3 meals in 20
hours. FSP is good but the food/drink side of things is very unrealistic. Ither the meals contain around 500 calories
each or these passengers have
colossally fast metabolics rates. Stupid. Please sort this out!

Flight NF695 In flight report Date June 17 2006

Flight ID: NF695
Pilot: Richard G Rees-Williams
Company: Hermes Aviation Air Charter
Aircraft: Boeing 777-200LR
Flight Date: June 17 2006
Departure: 18h27 (22h27 GMT)
From: TNCC - Hato - Antilles
To: WIII - Soekarno Hatta Intl - Indonesia
Nbr of passengers: 376

Report:

Flight Distance: 9,387 Nm Fuel Used: 289847 lbs
Time Airborne: 19h32:24 Fuel Remaining: 55761 lbs
Flight Time (block): 19h38:41 Fuel Consumption: 14833 lbs/hour (until now)
Time on Ground: 00h06:21 Remaining fuel allow: 03h45:32 flight time
Average Speed: 480.09 kt With one hour reserve: 02h45:32 flight time
Max. Altitude: FL 400 (fuel stats based on current number)


Passengers current Opinion: Fear and Desperation.
-Are irritated by some drunk passengers.
-Are irritable because they are hungry.
-Most passengers are sleeping.

Still another 3 hours to go. What will the pax satisfaction be then? -934672439674862824 I bet



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 04:18 )

[Jetflyer]

I bet this is what the final report will look like.

Flight NF478 flight report log Date June 16 2006

Flight ID: NF478
Pilot: Richard G Rees-Williams
Company: Hermes Aviation Air Charter
Aircraft: Boeing 777-200LR
Flight Date: June 16 2006
Departure: 19h25 (13h26 GMT)
Arrival: 05h29 (09h29 GMT)
From: WMKK - Kuala Lumpur Intl - Malaysia
To: TNCC - Hato - Antilles
Nbr of Passengers: 359

Report:

Flight Distance: 9,752 Nm Landing Speed: 126.91 kt
Time Airborne: 20h01:45 Landing Touchdown: -158.46 ft/m (nice)
Flight Time (block): 20h05:53 Landing Pitch: 3.66�
Time On Ground: 00h04:33 Landing Weight: 427714 lbs
Average Speed: 486.58 kt Total Fuel Used: 299262 lbs
Max. Altitude: FL 390 Fuel Not Used: 46232 lbs
Climb Time: 00h32:04 Climb Fuel Used: 19576 lbs
Cruise Time: 18h17:28 Cruise Fuel Used: 263517 lbs
Average Cruise Speed: 505.71 kt (M0.83) Cruise fuel/hour: 14406 lbs (calc)
Descent Time: 01h12:13 Descent Fuel Used: 16168 lbs


Passenger Opinion: Terror, panic grief and delerium 0%

Financial Report:

u made no money

Company Reputation:

The flight was obivously a disaster because apart from the fact that the crew ferried the aircraft half the way around the world in a safe,
professional and efficient manner, the three square meals served in the flight time simply wasn't enough and the passegners became terrifide on the flight and resorted to cannibalism. Unfotunately yuo killed all your pax -2813758375% you rep is now down to -2349587485%


Overall Flight Result: Disaster

Pilot Bonus points: -39999999999999999999999 points

All your passengers starved to death



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 04:24 )

[Jetflyer]

Oh yes and another beef I have. I took off this flight at 04:00 AM yesterday, and it is now 3:27AM here, but the flight time so far says 19:45 hours.
That is WRONG it should be over 23 hours! What time is this running off? I'm doing this in real time and FSPax can't work out time! LOLSM



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 04:28 )

[jetBlue220]

Maybe you shouldn't be flying an over 10,000 nm flight in a 777? Or in any other plane?

Just a suggestion.



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 06:40 )

[aristoteles]

Maybe you shouldn't be flying an over 10,000 nm flight in a 777? Or in any other plane?

Just a suggestion.

[Drew]

Jetflyer wrote:
FSP is good but the food/drink side of things is very unrealistic. Ither the meals contain around 500 calories
each or these passengers have
colossally fast metabolics rates. Stupid. Please sort this out!

if its such a big issue, why not use manual service? or is 1 extra key command every 4 hours or soo too much of a stress on your
workload?

[Jetflyer]

Drew wrote:

Jetflyer wrote:
FSP is good but the food/drink side of things is very unrealistic. Ither the meals contain around 500 calories
each or these passengers have
colossally fast metabolics rates. Stupid. Please sort this out!

if its such a big issue, why not use manual service? or is 1 extra key command every 4 hours or soo too much of a stress on your
workload?

Fing hell don't take it so seriously. Sarcasm is an unnecessary and unfunny tactic. BTW you run out of meals on such a flight so it doesn't matter if
I use manual OR automatic service. Some people like to do 20 hr flights. FSP should cater for them too and have realistic hunger levels for
passengers. Let me repeat: its nothing to do with whether it's manual or automatic service. I have no problem manually serving food but the meals run out. Don't you get what I'm saying? Can't someone else help out because you always are least helpful or try to talk down to me and I don't like it.



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 16:06 )

[Drew]

Maybe im least helpful you you because of your attitute in previous thread

ps, i could do a 20 hour flight (thou why would i ever want to do that i dont know) without the pax being hungry once

its all to do with your take off time, and the time you serve each meal, PLUS you have cold food spare also.

i'd explain, but you wouldnt listen anyway



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 16:16 )

[Jetflyer]

Drew wrote:
Maybe im least helpful you you because of your attitute in previous thread

ps, i could do a 20 hour flight (thou why would i ever want to do that i dont know) without the pax being hungry once

its all to do with your take off time, and the time you serve each meal, PLUS you have cold food spare also.

i'd explain, but you wouldnt listen anyway

Which thread? I wasn't personally rude to you so I don't deserve you being saracastic to me!

Drew wrote:
Maybe im least helpful you you because of your attitute in previous thread

ps, i could do a 20 hour flight (thou why would i ever want to do that i dont know) without the pax being hungry once

its all to do with your take off time, and the time you serve each meal, PLUS you have cold food spare also.

i'd explain, but you wouldnt listen anyway

Some people like doing 20hr flights. Just like others only wan to do 2-3 hr flights or less. It's personal preference. BTW I always takeoff AFTER the pax have had dinner, and it says they will be hungry in 7 hours, so I'm perfectly aware of the times to serve everything but the same happens. Infact the satisfacton level went into minus numbers. I don't know how that figures.



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 16:20 )

[jetBlue220]

From my experience, FsPassengers models the most realistic and real-life settings that it can... So, naturally, you wouldn't have enough food for a
flight that is NOT possible in real life.. If you went down to what the 777's range is, which would be a bit more reasonable, and if you managed the
service correctly (manually,) then I'm positive you would not have a problem.

[Drew]

have i said anything about you doing a 20 hour flight? NO
i have said i would not want to do a 20 hour flight

try to engage the reading part of your brain before commenting

[Drew]

Jetflyer wrote:


Which thread? I wasn't personally rude to you so I don't deserve you being saracastic to me!

.

how about this one for starters.........

http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/showth...8#pid63228

[Jetflyer]

jetBlue220 wrote:
From my experience, FsPassengers models the most realistic and real-life settings that it can... So, naturally, you wouldn't have enough food for a
flight that is NOT possible in real life.. If you went down to what the 777's range is, which would be a bit more reasonable, and if you managed the
service correctly (manually,) then I'm positive you would not have a problem.

Sorry but the 777-200LR, yes LR, not sure if you know what that means, but it's "longer range", "worldliner" etc,,, look it up on Boeing's website, is
capable of doing over 10,000nm. So it is possible in real life. Even if it wasn';t, this is a simulator and will never be realistic. The way the
passengers get hungry is about as unrealistic as a 777 doing a 100,000nm flight.

Drew wrote:
have i said anything about you doing a 20 hour flight? NO
i have said i would not want to do a 20 hour flight

try to engage the reading part of your brain before commenting

See what I mean by a totally inappropriate comment. Why are you a moderator?



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 16:26 )

[jetBlue220]

I know perfectly well what LR means.

It's range is not over 10,000 nm.

Extending the range of the market-leading 777 family by more than 1,500 nautical miles (2,775 kilometers), the 777-200LR (Longer Range) allows
airlines to service nonstop routes such as New York-Singapore and Los Angeles-Dubai at full passenger capacity and carry revenue cargo. The 777-200LR
can carry 301 passengers up to 9,420 nautical miles (17,446 kilometers).

- From Boeing's website, which you told me to look at. http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005...0215g.html

And, what I said about being realistic. You have FSP, which IS as realistic as possible.. so, you're trying to do something that is unrealistic, and then complaining that it can't be done..

Also.. You had 376 passengers. Based on above, the 9420 nm range is based on 301 passengers.



Post Edited ( 06-18-06 16:29 )

[Drew]

why am i a moderator you ask?

Because i can point people to the FAQ - is that not a good enough reason?





Post Edited ( 06-18-06 16:33 )