Why does reputation goes more than 5% when you land safely after plane is hit?

[xsailor]

As everyone else, i try to fly from Baghdad and land safely. However every time i do this, although i get a perfect score, with 1000's of Bonus
points, passengers feel terror and grief and my reputation goes more than 5 percent. Why is that? Shouldn't those pricks be grateful to be landed safely??

[Recon]

Wait..... let me read it good.
You try to get out of Bagdad and you do land safely.
You write you get good points, even 1000's you say.
I asume that you are getting shot at, and your plane suffers damage and even with that you still manage to land that's why you get a lot of
points.
If so, (if not like this then be a little more specific) Of course the pax are not very happy.

[gbapache]

Are you really serious with this stupid question???? You flew pax in a combat zone and landed safely after getting shot up and wonder
why your peeps arne't happy????????????????????????????????

[Tracker801]

Apache.....
Heel.......

[xsailor]

hmm

Are you reading your post? Are you crazy?

"Landing safely after getting shot up"

Why would they be pissed to be alive??

gbapache wrote:
Are you really serious with this stupid question???? You flew pax in a combat zone and landed safely after getting shot up and wonder
why your peeps arne't happy????????????????????????????????

[Recon]

Of course the are happy to land safely, bigger part was that they are affraid of the shots at the plane and stuff.
So it is logic that that general speaking not to happy about it.
They are from the 100% flight, say for example 90% in fear and terror.
So you really think that that last 10% of a safe landing will compromise that?????

xsailor wrote:
hmm

Are you reading your post? Are you crazy?

"Landing safely after getting shot up"

Why would they be pissed to be alive??

gbapache wrote:
Are you really serious with this stupid question???? You flew pax in a combat zone and landed safely after getting shot up and wonder
why your peeps arne't happy????????????????????????????????

[poden]

It gets a little weird, evaluating human emotions using a game's point system. If they were flying to Baghdad or another war zone,theoretically they
shouldn't be surprised at being shot at. Honestly, in the real world, I don't think what they're thinking about the flight experience would reflect
much on the airline one way or the other, given they're landing in Baghdad. Generally they would likely be happy just to land safely.

IMHO, of course.

[Recon]

poden wrote:
It gets a little weird, evaluating human emotions using a game's point system. If they were flying to Baghdad or another war
zone,theoretically they
shouldn't be surprised at being shot at. Honestly, in the real world, I don't think what they're thinking about the flight experience would
reflect
much on the airline one way or the other, given they're landing in Baghdad. Generally they would likely be happy just to land safely.

IMHO, of course.

Yes that could be,......but you cannot put real emotions in a program he
And further then that is that your main consurn is that you are still a live and how or what made you still a live is at the first moment of
landing not of intrest to anybody.
Because you are safe at the ground.
Later maybe yes, then they are thankfull to the pilot of his skills, but the first emotions are fear and terror, they call it also shock.
So in this case when you landed the pax dont think about being thankfull, they are in shock and fear right after landing.
When you are expecting applause or 100's of thank you's your are very selfish.
Later you can expect that but not right after the landing, and FsP close short after landing

[0Artur0]

Maybe there should be "Warzone mode"... like flying UN missions or something like that... in that case the passengers should be very happy to land
safely.
On the other hand.. anybody who is flying from or in Baghdad should be happy to stay alive.
I wonder what's the logic behind warzones... you get points if you survive but your reputation suffers... it would make more sense if you'd get
negative points since you wandered into warzone.. or get positive points and PAX should be happy to survive... just my opinion.

[Recon]

0Artur0 wrote:
On the other hand.. anybody who is flying from or in Baghdad should be happy to stay alive.
I wonder what's the logic behind warzones... you get points if you survive but your reputation suffers... it would make more sense if you'd
get
negative points since you wandered into warzone.. or get positive points and PAX should be happy to survive... just my opinion.

I just explain that in my last post.



Post Edited ( 10-20-09 15:41 )

[xsailor]

Next time anyone flies over Baghdad, do us all a favor and crash these suckers' asses into the dessert so they don't complain and ruin the reputation.

HAH!

[Recon]

xsailor wrote:
Next time anyone flies over Baghdad, do us all a favor and crash these suckers' asses into the dessert so they don't complain and ruin
the reputation.

HAH!

LOL also a possibility

[0Artur0]

Recon wrote:
I just explain that in my last post.

Yes, you did.
But my question was a little bit different... if this is "normal" flight than your explanation is true. But "normal" flights have nothing to do in
warzones. I'm talking about some kind of "warzone" flights, UN missions, humanitarian missions kind of flights.. in that case nobody should be
surprised about the situation and they'd probably be very happy to stay alive... they know where they are going and what to expect. If they are
shocked and scared thet's not because pilot made an error (negative reputation) but because it's a scary situation they already expected.
My opinion.

[Recon]

0Artur0 wrote:

Recon wrote:
I just explain that in my last post.

Yes, you did.
But my question was a little bit different... if this is "normal" flight than your explanation is true. But "normal" flights
have nothing to do in
warzones. I'm talking about some kind of "warzone" flights, UN missions, humanitarian missions kind of flights.. in that case
nobody should be
surprised about the situation and they'd probably be very happy to stay alive... they know where they are going and what to expect. If they
are
shocked and scared thet's not because pilot made an error (negative reputation) but because it's a scary situation they already expected.
My opinion.

Then you missed the point in my post....
Nobody said the pilot made an error, this is not the case!!!!!!
The case is that the passengers are affraid and scared of what happend.
If this hapend in real life and you ask the pax right after landing how do you feel and what do you think about the company.
Dude,.....the react "i am so scared, so affraid, I cannot believe that we are still alive." and you ask them then "well and what do you find
about my flying sir?"
What you think they will say??????? It is about the mental shock people get right after a flight like that.
So there first emotions is NOT thankfull to the pilot, but is scared and affraid.
And even so that you can expect doesn't mean that you not going to be affraid and scared.
If I put you on a real plane and let you fly over a warzone and you know that, it is fine.
But at the moment the start to shoot your ass then you will have a total other emotion about it.
And if the plane is so shot and damaged you will not say to your self oh, I know this was possible, no you will be affraid.
And people in that kind off emotion react very different then you expect, they can even blame you for not flying high enough or you got to
take a other route etc etc etc.

[gbapache]

I'm quite sure niether of you has been shot at over Iraq while flying (very high pucker factor) but I digress. There is NO reason to fly from or to Baghdad other
than to collect points or to sharpen the 'ol panel out, single engine, no hydraulics landing skills, either way you're a dumb-*ss for expecting your paying cattle to be
happy about it. Have a nice day.