17-02-2006, 12:20 PM
apparently fs10 is not purely Windows Vista only apparently its compatible with XP?
FSP + FS 2006 = ???
|
17-02-2006, 12:20 PM
apparently fs10 is not purely Windows Vista only apparently its compatible with XP?
18-02-2006, 06:05 PM
i think so because they say they are trying to make everything in fs9 be able to work in fsX (the new flight simulator coming out during
vacation time)
18-02-2006, 06:35 PM
Quote:FsP Dennis wrote:Decent frame rates with XP? ![]() http://www.addictivesimulations.com/
18-02-2006, 06:38 PM
It's funny, IMHO, how a thread from September just shows up in February
![]() I want to get a new comp. round then with Vista and an AMD Athlon XP 64 3200+
--
![]() ![]() "Unos, Dos, Tres, Catorce!"
18-02-2006, 06:42 PM
Quote:WBHoenig wrote: ![]() http://www.addictivesimulations.com/
18-02-2006, 11:43 PM
Another thing that is funny is !! How we are eagerly awaiting a couple of products that are still 8 months away(minimum!!)Talk about wishing your life
away
Navigator first class
I never get lost -- Everyone tells me where to go ![]() ![]()
18-02-2006, 11:46 PM
Quote:WBHoenig wrote: thats because i started it ![]() ![]()
19-02-2006, 02:52 AM
I remember reading this thread right before registering here... Drew, your post count was around 20
![]()
--
![]() ![]() "Unos, Dos, Tres, Catorce!"
20-02-2006, 07:01 AM
I just hope the payware addon will work. It'll be a shame if FsP, LDS767, PMDG planes, etc, don't work with FSX. And it'll probably be a
decent time until a nice payware addon becomes avaible. But I don't even know if FSX will be that much of an improvement over 2004. They're just focusing on the scenery. They still have default planes and stupid ATC. I remember that when I upgraded from 2002 to 2004, all I saw was a difference in the graphics, all the ATC and flight dynamics were the same.
20-02-2006, 01:14 PM
Quote: jetsim wrote : I don't know jetsim but i think so because Mircrosoft says to get FSX to work optimally they recommed windows vista but ofcause could windows xp be used to. ![]() ![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|