[closed] FsPassengers for FSX official note and Blog !

[DanSteph]

jeffreycor wrote:
To bad you are way out from California, I'd supply a monitor for you for a FSPX license

To bad, but thanks I feel like a cyclop with only one...

infernalsolo wrote:
In addition to the failures generated by FSP, will it also detect failures generated by the aircraft itself?

Impossible technically, "self failure" might be their internal code, if they use FsX failure first FsP would have to check every of the 50
possible failure of FsX every loop you would get many inconsitency in report (why the thing failed ? pilot error ? other? how to judge that?)
and you would have FsPX in about 2 years from now and it would weight 400 mb (because of all announcment sounds for failure).

FsPX is a *good* program, it's not the *god* of all programs

Propilot23k wrote:
Just curious if you still will have to choose your passenger count and payload number or will there be an option for FSp to now give you a
random load?

Load yet depend of reputation, price etc etc and a random factor... will be the same yes.

Dan

[Cydon Prax]

Hey, Dan. Will FspX include, similar to a single gear failure, a flap failure? (Using FSX's differential flap system)?

Simply put, I've found that is the single most deadliest failure in Fsx. You're slow, low, and loosing directional control of the plane without
an idea why; the plane can be in the ground in less than 7 seconds if you don't catch it.

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not asking you include it if it isn't added (I'd rather not be raided and killed by furious FsPax fans who think
I'm trying to delay the release), I'm just wondering if its part of the failure list.

Ken.

[jeroeng21]

Hey,

Can FspX also used in multiplayer mode?

Jeroen.

[m0thm]

I'd rather not be raided and killed by furious FsPax fans who think
I'm trying to delay the release

Chicken :P

i also am hoping this is in the system as only having half of something always seems harder than not having it at all. i have known of people
successfully landing even with half a wing missing i can only wonder how such feats are done my only guess would be survival instinct sharpening the
mind.

last instance i herd of such a thing was a few years back when a friends son who was glider tugging in a cub was in a mid air with a glider the glider
who hit removed a large portion of his left wing. the cub and glider on tow landed successfully despite the damage the glider who hit the tug was a
fatality. guess its true what they say tugging is a dangerous occupation.

i would love to see Microsoft (not FSPX) sort out their tugging code as its very bad practice for the tug just to tow out in a straight line the tug
should turn and keep you within final glide of the airfield (unless you are transporting cross country by tug of course) and lets hope they can get us
a winch launch come FS11 with cable breaks and teh works i have always felt that the humble glider nuts (me included) have always been badly catered
for by Microsoft which is a shame considering how good FS is its just about teh only pice of software MS publish that i truly like.

Im loving what we are hearing from Dan about the upcoming FSPX sounds like its going to rock the FSX experience even more than the 2004 version did
for FS2004.

Dan i feel your dual monitor pain and hope you don't wear out your alt and tab keys :P

[DanSteph]

Please note: Beta tester subscription is closed yet. Thanks for not sending mails anymore

Hey, Dan. Will FspX include, similar to a single gear failure, a flap failure? (Using FSX's differential flap system)?

Differential flaps exist already in 2004 version if excess Vfe speed but it's planned I add one "random".
Full differential is too deadly, I think the difference in 04 was... wait... +-2% and it was already really disturbing.

jeroeng21 wrote:
Can FspX also used in multiplayer mode?
Jeroen.

Depend what you call "multiplayer": sharing FsP data in real time ? no and never, with all work involved the release date would be 2010, almost all code has to be reworked, most probably it would never be published (too complicated). If you mean playing online with each player having FsP of course yes.

Cheers

Dan



Post Edited ( 09-20-08 06:47 )

[Atlantic Airways]

Failure request: Is it possible to Do these failures:

-pilots and co-pilots Airspeed indicators,Heading indicators, etc. have different informations.
-Sudden loss of control (Caused by an object hitting and damaging rudder,Wing flaps??)
-one part if the wing falls off (caused by winds or overspeed.. for old crafts)

This is just a request..

[forzaksc1894]

When there is a failure (for example the engine doesn´t work anymore or it got fire).. what´s with the ATC and landing clearance? In Standard FSX
you´re not favored if you have an emergency. Will this be different in FSPX?

[Atlantic Airways]

FSPX And ATC in FSX does not co-operate at all.. I recomend you: buy Radar Contact 4, There you can ask for an emergency landing, and
the Program will clear all AI Traffic on that airport.. RC4 is Better than FSX ATC in many ways:

-Voice recognition, means you can talk to the ATC
-More un-Microsoft Sam'ish voices
- and more realistic!

:P:P
.. so no it won't be in FSPX

[forzaksc1894]

.. so no it won't be in FSPX

but if the engines doesn´t work anymore and i have to land on the nearest runway, and the tower advises me to fly an aerodrome traffic circuit, but i
can´t fly an circuit anymore and so i crash into an AI aircraft for example. And now?

p.s. sorry for the bloody english
p.p.s. I think about to buy an ATC-Tool for FSX, but there´ll be anyway people, who hasn´t an ATC-Tool for FSX

[Atlantic Airways]

i recommend to change freq and go for it

[Daveo]

forzaksc1894 wrote:

.. so no it won't be in FSPX

but if the engines doesn´t work anymore and i have to land on the nearest runway, and the tower advises me to fly an aerodrome traffic
circuit, but i
can´t fly an circuit anymore and so i crash into an AI aircraft for example. And now?

p.s. sorry for the bloody english
p.p.s. I think about to buy an ATC-Tool for FSX, but there´ll be anyway people, who hasn´t an ATC-Tool for FSX

Change your destination airport first and you'll get clearance.

[Atlantic Airways]

Daveo wrote:

forzaksc1894 wrote:

.. so no it won't be in FSPX

but if the engines doesn´t work anymore and i have to land on the nearest runway, and the tower advises me to fly an aerodrome traffic
circuit, but i
can´t fly an circuit anymore and so i crash into an AI aircraft for example. And now?

p.s. sorry for the bloody english
p.p.s. I think about to buy an ATC-Tool for FSX, but there´ll be anyway people, who hasn´t an ATC-Tool for FSX

Change your destination airport first and you'll get clearance.

Welcome onboard Daveo

Yeah or you can do that :P!

[Daveo]

Welcome onboard Daveo

Thanx. Actually been squattin here for quite awhile and waiting.

Daveo
ESSB

[m0thm]

ahhh who needs engines :P just pick a runway and go use visual rules after all your RT may well go down as well!

[DanielDuarte]

Hi Dan, I only regist in this forum to tell you that i´m waiting for your fantastic and incredibily work.
For me you are a genius because you will "give" me a product that transform my dream a little bit reality... to be a pilot.

Thanks a lot and good work....

Daniel

PS: Your name is really beautiful... isn´t it?!...