14-01-2006, 11:39 AM
Quote:You would be possibly correct if they wereAh yes, I see now. Well, I guess this little inaccuracy is not the reason to complain. It's just supposed that if you can perform a great
killed because of the crash near the parking that really took place; but not because of the rough landing that did not exist.
landing then safe taxiing should not be a roblem for you!

It could be changed though.

Quote:But there's no satisfaction indicator on the real aircraft either.Well, not xactly, but you may obtain this info from flight attendant at anytime. They are trained to be able to figure this out under any
possible circumstances.

Quote:If it exists in FSP, and it depends on the turbulence, then wouldn't it beBut id does! When pax are scared by turbulence, then it says: "passengers are terrified by turbulence". Haven't you noticed this?
logical to indicate the turbulence.

Quote:first say there's turbulence, then that the pax are scared by it.I see what you mean, but this is not possible. Pax are goung scared in the first seconds of the turbulence effect (it's realistic). And FsP
can not predicate turbulence as you understand.

John