22-09-2013, 03:23 PM
1) Yes, but not at all realistic in random fashion, then it would be easy to write a few extra lines in the program for it to work as risk areas.
2) damage
3) ridiculous, while the option existed in the first version, and Dan at the time I was assured that reinstates the option.
4) damage
5) damage
6) fake it does not work and never worked.
And for all which is a shame, a software which does not change at the request of its users eventually die and disappear.
Language for the first mail that I had shared with Dan in his time were French, and I am against the dictatorship of the English language
attentamente
2) damage
3) ridiculous, while the option existed in the first version, and Dan at the time I was assured that reinstates the option.
4) damage
5) damage
6) fake it does not work and never worked.
And for all which is a shame, a software which does not change at the request of its users eventually die and disappear.
Language for the first mail that I had shared with Dan in his time were French, and I am against the dictatorship of the English language
attentamente
![[-]](http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/images/collapse.png)