23-05-2008, 04:11 AM
Does it have to be named WAR ZONES?
Why can't it be named Military Activity Zones? It is much more realistic to have MAZ NE of San Fransisco (like in the FSP2004 demo) than
to have War Zones there, and in Sweden to have War Zones is just not translating good, it's about translation perhaps... There is nothing
connecting Swedish Military Shooting ranges with War, but I would mark it up as Military Activity Zone and to fly into it means a lot of risk
and also it would be an error by the pilot.
If War Zones is just meant to be places where an actual War goes on, then only Iraq and some other places would be war Zones right
now - is it the demo that is special and in the full version there is no war zones in USA?
Why can't it be named Military Activity Zones? It is much more realistic to have MAZ NE of San Fransisco (like in the FSP2004 demo) than
to have War Zones there, and in Sweden to have War Zones is just not translating good, it's about translation perhaps... There is nothing
connecting Swedish Military Shooting ranges with War, but I would mark it up as Military Activity Zone and to fly into it means a lot of risk
and also it would be an error by the pilot.
If War Zones is just meant to be places where an actual War goes on, then only Iraq and some other places would be war Zones right
now - is it the demo that is special and in the full version there is no war zones in USA?
'min hemsida' SDAX http://www.sdax.se/ Trav, Schack och Blog
'my homepage' SDAX http://www.sdax.se/ Troftting, Chess and Blog
'my homepage' SDAX http://www.sdax.se/ Troftting, Chess and Blog
![[-]](http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/images/collapse.png)