03-01-2008, 02:16 PM
Yes his attitude is very agressive so If he really wanted to help or get money as he claimed the only things he has to do was to contact me
by mail at first and show some technicall proof, that's easy you know, coder's language cannot be faked: You know the subject or not !
Now even a screenshot or a technicall proof take only 2mn to show we still don't have any proof so I bet he don't have the solution and his
point was not really to help me or the community or even to get a job.
Troll !
Now for those that believe that one can rewrite an application that contain 70'000 lines of C++ code starting from only *crypted* and
*assembly* code wich is at best unreadable for an app of this size I would say that's ridiculous claim at best. If it would be so easy one
would have seen 347 FsP like program during the last ten years. Still there is only one and it was written in C++. It's not easy in C++ it's
impossible in assembly not to speak about rewriting the ~10'000+ lines that cause problems with FsX.
For those that don't know assembly is that:, no readable text of hint for an external coder, only machine code!
Two line of C++ code give often 4-10 lines of assembly, imagine correcting FsP digging in 280'000 lines like that !
(given that he decrypted it also)
If this guy would really have the solution he would be the best genius coder in the world and we would have seen a lot of other proof about
him or another attitude than "ah ah tadidoudaa" and "oh people are not nice with me, I don't show the solution" wich he had at the very
start even before I write myself.
Now this ridiculous story only make me loose my time, so I'll simply cut off any other posts about this subject. My email is still open if he
want to show his wonderful work.
Now if you contact him beware, I smell some bad things going on... if he want your unlock code for example to make "further test"
Thanks.
Dan
by mail at first and show some technicall proof, that's easy you know, coder's language cannot be faked: You know the subject or not !
Now even a screenshot or a technicall proof take only 2mn to show we still don't have any proof so I bet he don't have the solution and his
point was not really to help me or the community or even to get a job.
Troll !
Now for those that believe that one can rewrite an application that contain 70'000 lines of C++ code starting from only *crypted* and
*assembly* code wich is at best unreadable for an app of this size I would say that's ridiculous claim at best. If it would be so easy one
would have seen 347 FsP like program during the last ten years. Still there is only one and it was written in C++. It's not easy in C++ it's
impossible in assembly not to speak about rewriting the ~10'000+ lines that cause problems with FsX.
For those that don't know assembly is that:, no readable text of hint for an external coder, only machine code!
Two line of C++ code give often 4-10 lines of assembly, imagine correcting FsP digging in 280'000 lines like that !
(given that he decrypted it also)
Code:
mov edi,edi
push ebp
mov ebp,esp
mov edx,dword ptr [ebp+8]
or eax,0FFFFFFFFh
test edx,edx
je 650E82DF
mov ecx,dword ptr [edx+14h]
cmp ecx,dword ptr ds:[6520A89Ch]
jae 650E82DF
push esi
mov esi,dword ptr ds:[6520A8A0h]
test esi,esi
je 650E82DE
mov ecx,dword ptr [esi+ecx*4]
If this guy would really have the solution he would be the best genius coder in the world and we would have seen a lot of other proof about
him or another attitude than "ah ah tadidoudaa" and "oh people are not nice with me, I don't show the solution" wich he had at the very
start even before I write myself.
Now this ridiculous story only make me loose my time, so I'll simply cut off any other posts about this subject. My email is still open if he
want to show his wonderful work.
Now if you contact him beware, I smell some bad things going on... if he want your unlock code for example to make "further test"
Thanks.
Dan