You misunderstood me.
I am not complaining about the reaction of virtual passengers.
I'm aware that passengers do not take into account objective conditions.
"FS Passengers" simulates it perfectly. And that's perfectly okay. What is more, that's a part of the fun
I just think that "FS Passengers" should not accuse (and punish) a pilot for things he did not commit.
OK, there were turbulences on the way. The plane was throwing. The passengers felt it and were not satisfied. That's clear.
However, the pilot did not perform any violent or dangerous maneuvers and "FS Passengers" should take this into account in his assessment.
Turbulence - yes.
Aerobatics. - no.
I'm using FSXWX weather engine. The biggest problem with a "FS Passengers" that thinks I'm doing some aerobatics, is so called Clear-Air Turbulence at the cruising altitude when the seatbelt sign is off.
When I'm "diving" into the clouds covering the fjord, passengers are sitting in their seats securely strapped, and everything is okay.
I am not complaining about the reaction of virtual passengers.
I'm aware that passengers do not take into account objective conditions.
"FS Passengers" simulates it perfectly. And that's perfectly okay. What is more, that's a part of the fun

I just think that "FS Passengers" should not accuse (and punish) a pilot for things he did not commit.
OK, there were turbulences on the way. The plane was throwing. The passengers felt it and were not satisfied. That's clear.
However, the pilot did not perform any violent or dangerous maneuvers and "FS Passengers" should take this into account in his assessment.
Turbulence - yes.
Aerobatics. - no.

I'm using FSXWX weather engine. The biggest problem with a "FS Passengers" that thinks I'm doing some aerobatics, is so called Clear-Air Turbulence at the cruising altitude when the seatbelt sign is off.
When I'm "diving" into the clouds covering the fjord, passengers are sitting in their seats securely strapped, and everything is okay.