11-12-2005, 11:29 PM
My review...
NASA World Wind 1.3 is basicly like Google Earth, NASA's got way better high up ariel view's, but Google's got exellent shots of close up
things, like your house and stuff. Neither of them have been updated in the last while, they both do not show the Jumeirah Palm Islands,
which is kind of disapointing. Google's got amazing shot's of South Africa, I've zoomed in on a heard of elephants before, it's amazing,
and I've caught a heard of penguins in the north
. I don't know how Google has the technology to have perfect ariel views of certain areas
but NASA doesn't? My final verdict... Google Earth take's less time to set up and load, and is generally very simple comapred to World
Wind. But, World Wind does not have random coulour patches everywhere, where as Google Earth does. Concidering you can zoom in
on a parked Mercades on a ten-lane highway in the United Arab Emirates, I'd give this one to Google!
NASA World Wind 1.3 is basicly like Google Earth, NASA's got way better high up ariel view's, but Google's got exellent shots of close up
things, like your house and stuff. Neither of them have been updated in the last while, they both do not show the Jumeirah Palm Islands,
which is kind of disapointing. Google's got amazing shot's of South Africa, I've zoomed in on a heard of elephants before, it's amazing,
and I've caught a heard of penguins in the north
. I don't know how Google has the technology to have perfect ariel views of certain areas but NASA doesn't? My final verdict... Google Earth take's less time to set up and load, and is generally very simple comapred to World
Wind. But, World Wind does not have random coulour patches everywhere, where as Google Earth does. Concidering you can zoom in
on a parked Mercades on a ten-lane highway in the United Arab Emirates, I'd give this one to Google!
![[Image: ti9mr.png]](http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/3723/ti9mr.png)
![[-]](http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/images/collapse.png)