20-09-2005, 08:58 AM
Flight1 are working on a 732, and Feelthere are working on the 733/4/5 series under their Pilot In Command lable. Until then I don't know
of any. What is wrong with the PMDG cockpit though?? It has all the bells/whistles of most modern airliners and since the service
releases and patches that have been done since it's original release now even has a working VC. Having seen pics of a real 737 owned
by NASA I think it looks pretty spot on. Boeing are a very different animal to Airbus, for one thing the Airbuses are FBW which the 737
(correct me if I'm wrong here Brad) is not. The Airbus is roughly equivalent (as airliners go) to the F16 in that it's all flown by computers
and if PSS one is on the nail doesn't even have a proper throttle on it.....
I mean c'mon who heard of using detents to do everything,
even Concorde (and yes she was Fly-by-wire too) had a normal throttle on her and she was 30 years ahead of her time.
of any. What is wrong with the PMDG cockpit though?? It has all the bells/whistles of most modern airliners and since the service
releases and patches that have been done since it's original release now even has a working VC. Having seen pics of a real 737 owned
by NASA I think it looks pretty spot on. Boeing are a very different animal to Airbus, for one thing the Airbuses are FBW which the 737
(correct me if I'm wrong here Brad) is not. The Airbus is roughly equivalent (as airliners go) to the F16 in that it's all flown by computers
and if PSS one is on the nail doesn't even have a proper throttle on it.....
I mean c'mon who heard of using detents to do everything, even Concorde (and yes she was Fly-by-wire too) had a normal throttle on her and she was 30 years ahead of her time.
![[Image: sdc5.jpg]](http://www.fspassengers.com/images/banner/sig/sdc5.jpg)
Flying for Landmark Airlines.
![[-]](http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/images/collapse.png)