05-09-2005, 05:56 PM
They are not real photos
Look to the first, the reflexions don't match the objects (we should see the reflexion of the plane in such angle), on the second the clouds are
totally different in reflexion than in the sky.
But it gives a good effect and certainly cost less in machine ressource to apply defaults reflexion effects than actually compute the reflected object
from the real.
I hope some progress about the landing light beams also. better scales for objects like trees and water texture.
Just for the visual.
About feature, I already ranted about the ATC, ADI (Artificial Dumb Traffic) poor flight planner and mapviews.
Wait and See (and begin to spare money for the computer necessary to run it)
Look to the first, the reflexions don't match the objects (we should see the reflexion of the plane in such angle), on the second the clouds are
totally different in reflexion than in the sky.
But it gives a good effect and certainly cost less in machine ressource to apply defaults reflexion effects than actually compute the reflected object
from the real.
I hope some progress about the landing light beams also. better scales for objects like trees and water texture.
Just for the visual.
About feature, I already ranted about the ATC, ADI (Artificial Dumb Traffic) poor flight planner and mapviews.
Wait and See (and begin to spare money for the computer necessary to run it)
![[Image: banniere064.png]](http://www.britair-virtual.com/bannieres/banniere064.png)
![[-]](http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/images/collapse.png)