Has to be done........ Great Job Dan and Testers

[rchwallace]

Hey everyone else is saying so why not............. it is truely an excellent release for FS. Great stuff.

I have only had the chance to test the demo but have done two flights. One KSFO-CYVR, real world weather was giving crap in KSFO so
my PAX were frightened even before we left........ anyhoo, worked great also have done a flight to KLAS, served drinks and sandwhiches
on that flight, full meal deal with supersize to van with a movie. Second flight went much better as I was a bit more used to the program....
but funny enough I have been dinged twice for minus points... I dont remember what it was for the first flight but reverse below 60 for the
second........ in the 777 we are not restricted, though below 70kts we are to have the reverse near idle unless operationaly required.
None the less........ two questions for the future........

1) Landing lights and 10000ft, in our operation we use the lights to TOC and from TOD so I would like to request an option to configure
the landing lights point for penalty. If not possible no worries as I can just turn them off in the sim at 10000ft but for operational
consistency with my programed method of operation........ TOC would be great.

2) LD 767, when I load the fuel for the flight with the pax screen in FSPAX the fuel loads into the mains and the wing tanks. Now in the
777 and 744 we never use center tank fuel unless it is required.......... as in the main tanks (wings) are completely full or scheduled to be.
Is this a glitch with the fuel loading for FSPAX? Is there any way for the future in which we can specify our fuel load per tanks? I can not
change it in Aircraft Configuration in FS due to the FSPAX flight being terminated.

Anyhoo, I am off this evening for a flight so back in four to check the forum and make a purchase.......... GREAT JOB DAN..... love this
addon.......and of course GREAT JOB BETA TEAM for the hard work and dedication.

Cheers

Ron

[JayKae]

Thank you Ron It is appreciated

[pagir]

...and you can adjust all lights penalties in the option of FsP

And thank you!!!

Pagir

[jboweruk]

Oops, hey yeah, thanks to all rest of the team as well, Sorry guys I thanked Dan but of course a lot of other ppl got involved, well Thanks to
all of you guys and gals, a sweeter add-on I don't think I've ever bought (I didn't play the demo at all) and I buy a lot.

[DanSteph]

rchwallace wrote:
2) LD 767, when I load the fuel for the flight with the pax screen in FSPAX the fuel loads into the mains and the wing tanks. Now in the
777 and 744 we never use center tank fuel unless it is required.......... as in the main tanks (wings) are completely full or scheduled to be.
Is this a glitch with the fuel loading for FSPAX? Is there any way for the future in which we can specify our fuel load per tanks? I can not
change it in Aircraft Configuration in FS due to the FSPAX flight being terminated.
Ron

Hello ron tanks for kind words...

about fuel there is a simple way... load your fuel BEFORE starting an FSP flight
and DON'T TOUCH the Fuel slider in payload dialog, the tank will remain
exactly as you set them...

during a long time there was a button "complexe fuel load" that I planned with a nice
top image and all the tanks but with the wide choice of configuration it was a pain
(and I was *a bit* in hurry) that *may* be added later.. (no promise)

Dan

[SWAFO]

The light penalties are completely optional. SWA flips off/on the landing lights at FL180, so I have that penalty disabled. One of the great
things about FSP! Customisation!

[Bry]

I was going to ask about the fuel loading, glad to see there is a work around

This really has been one of the best 'misc' additions I've ever used with FS. Its up there with the other essentials like FSNavigator and FSUIPC imo. Its
just such a complete package. A whole host of options but doesn't get lost in needless complexity in the design and interface.
With the fuel taken care of the only other thing I would venture to suggest is that some of the payware models available out there have very precisely
made FDE's, specifically something like the 3rd service update (in beta) to the SSTsim/Altitude/Koch Media Concorde which come with about 6 different
configurations to make sure the plane behaves as it should at the different available payloads. So it would be nice if it was possible to define a few
aircraft in such a way that passengers/cargo could be added without actually altering the stationloading in the FDE and potentially damaging the
finely tuned balance.

[rchwallace]

Hey everyone,

Just back... totally tired but may just take it for a rip. Thanks for the comments.... I will plan to load the fuel before the flight, cheers Dan.

Regards

Ron