| [Closed] Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Sergey V Fedorov 4 Posts Status: Young recruit | Date 03-12-12 16:45 | Sorry, I'm here first time and I don't know whether there is similar topic.
I use FsPassengers long time but it has very little change. Do you have plans to develop the project?
For example I come up with where I fly, I take on board all the passengers who expect something and tell them that
such a place we fly. I understand
that it's simple user interface, but I want more.
I want to select a group of passengers, who wants to fly to wherever you need the, depending on their number and the
distance I want to see how much
this freight per passenger. The larger the airport, the more willing to depart and the more the arrival airport, the larger
the group wanting to go
there. Also, the number of potential passengers depends on the pricing policy of the company.
Thanks and sorry for my English.
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
Author: gbapache 1551 Posts Status: Living Legend | Date 03-13-12 15:18 | The fast answer is.......no.

If it's stupid, but it works, it isn't stupid.
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Sergey V Fedorov 4 Posts Status: Young recruit | Date 03-13-12 19:34 | It's a pity... And not necessarily make a lot of changes to major changes in gameplay
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Sappo 9 Posts Status: Young recruit | Date 03-15-12 05:04 | I wonder if the community can rally together and continue development?
The framework is all there, we already had a fantastic module.
I for one am interested in digging into this and seeing what we can create
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Sergey V Fedorov 4 Posts Status: Young recruit | Date 03-15-12 12:42 | If the autor doesn't give the source codes, it'll not work. I am interested too, but I haven't free time so much, sorry But I can offer a lot of
ideas for improving gameplay.
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Sappo 9 Posts Status: Young recruit | Date 03-16-12 04:56 | I just happened to come across another similar product called FSCaptain
SImilar because it has the same scope and range, but focuses more on being the Captain of your plane (With FO) and less on the management of the
company itself, if it all.
It looks much more polished, with a nice interface and in-game gauge to load inside your plane, and it is in constant developement and patch work.
However it is not at all what many of us (FSPax) flyers are looking for 
I wonder if anyone has tried to contact the original creater of this fine product and ask for the source code, or permission to work on it.
It is obvious SOMEONE is out on the other end of this string, we have a domain, forums, working shop to purchase from.
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Joubarbe 16 Posts Status: Young recruit | Date 03-16-12 23:15 | Two years we waited for the developer to say something... The answer we had at the time we asked for updates was "be gentle, he's all
alone !"
Yeah, but maybe he should not stay alone if it's to not give any support.
EDIT : I wrote "two years" ! Ahahahah
Post Edited ( 03-16-12 23:17 )
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
Author: whiskey-zulu 1917 Posts Status: Forum Moderator | Date 03-17-12 00:19 | Patch for FSP is available; one for FSPX was on the cards, but we haven't heard anything in a few months. I know Dan is around, but even us mods
don't get all the info straight away.
Many people have asked in the past for the codes to help in development of the program, but all have thus far been refused.

Moderator
Please use the 'search' function on the forum and check the FAQ
Forum Rules: http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/forumsrules.php
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Joubarbe 16 Posts Status: Young recruit | Date 03-17-12 11:20 | I'm indeed talking about a patch for FSPX (so for FSX, and not FS9).
It's always the same thing, when some love a product, they want it to be upgraded. I can't fly without FSPX now, and that'd be very exciting to
see some new stuff in it. Community can do that, if Dan can't, and we should'nt stop asking for the source code 
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Zflightfs 37 Posts Status: Student pilot | Date 03-28-12 07:09 | Where the heck is dan!!!!!!!!!!!!!! we need a service pack or something, this tire blowout problem needs to get fixed
Ps. It not fare that fs2004 get an update and fsx doesn't!!!!!!!!!!!!!!👎
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
Author: poden 1580 Posts Status: Living Legend | Date 03-28-12 07:40 | The FS2004 update was a joke; it was just a fix for the guys using windows 7. And that's the only update Dan has done for, I dunno, like 4-odd years,
to either version. Don't expect any updates; it pretty clearly isn't going to happen.
300,000 km/sec. Its not just a good idea, its the law.
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
Author: gbapache 1551 Posts Status: Living Legend | Date 03-28-12 14:24 | Oh, and BTW it's a landing problem not a tire blowing problem. 

If it's stupid, but it works, it isn't stupid.
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Zflightfs 37 Posts Status: Student pilot | Date 03-28-12 19:20 | GIVE US THE SORCE CODE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡. Dan needs to hand over the rains to somebody new someone willing to advance this program further and not abandon it!
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
Author: Joeflyer 7790 Posts Status: Living Legend | Date 03-28-12 20:16 | Zflightfs...spit in one hand and wish in the other....see which one fills up the quickest Unfortunately your demands are going to be ignored.

|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Joubarbe 16 Posts Status: Young recruit | Date 03-28-12 21:10 | Besides, FSPassengers is 2nd in the top 5 of flightsimstore.com best sellers list, so it's not a question of not making enough money to fully
support the product. Greedy Dan 
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
Author: gbapache 1551 Posts Status: Living Legend | Date 03-29-12 00:41 | It makes me laugh to read the rantings of people with single digit posts about buging Dan for an update. 
Folks have been screaming for updates and patchs for years to no availe, with no end in sight to the wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Everyone should get over it and face the fact that they are going to have to learn how to land and that FSP and FSPX were written for
Windows XP, NOT Vista or Win 7. I'm sorry but these are the facts and they are undisputable.
Cheers 
Edit: And by the way please quit crying about there being no support. There is no support other than the other people who use the program alot and have figured out how to fix a problem here and there. Thank you for your time and attention.

If it's stupid, but it works, it isn't stupid.
Post Edited ( 03-29-12 00:46 )
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Zflightfs 37 Posts Status: Student pilot | Date 03-29-12 02:51 | Hah. you make me laugh, so much for customer service a good program should be kept up with updates at least one every other year.
We want to talk, or blog ,or type, or whatever to Dan directly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who are you anyways are you one of development or something!!!!
Post Edited ( 03-29-12 03:04 )
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
Author: timtomairways Www 1351 Posts Status: Living Legend | Date 03-29-12 04:35 | have you tried scrolling down tothe bottom of the webpage where it says Contact.
(okay imthrew being a smart ass for the day)
i just want to say if i can land a B737 in key west, Drop kicking the runway and still not blow a tire. enough said.


Mocha hagotdi
"Jack of all trades, master of none"
|
|
|
| Re: Can we hope of new development? |
|
Author: Zflightfs 37 Posts Status: Student pilot | Date 03-29-12 08:23 | Yes I have tried contacting him through the contact link multiple times and no reply, that's why I resorted to the forums, I don't even like forums I prefer individualized emails.
Speaking of blown tires what to dissent rate do you have on touchdown and is your default crash tolerance set to low?
|
|
|
|