+- FsPassengers Forums (http://www.fspassengers.com/forum)
+-- Forum: FsPassengers (http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: FsPassengers Customizing (http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: JUST WONDERIN... (/showthread.php?tid=9962)
Pages:
1
2
JUST WONDERIN... - bomen168 - 25-12-2005
I'm wondering why there is only a seatbelt sign on the Verbose Report but then there is no "NO SMOKING SIGN" icon thingie on there
too.....hmmm.....
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - Dutch64 - 25-12-2005
Just guessing here but i think the seatbelt sign can give you penalties if you use it wrongly while the non smoking sign has no consequences
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - WBHoenig - 25-12-2005
Because in most countries, it is illegal to smoke on any flight, no matter what the airline says. Although, it'd be cool to have that and get extra
money but a fee from the FAA if you turn off the no smoking sign.
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - SWAFO - 25-12-2005
That's true. I think it's not included because of the fact that on most commercial flights, smoking is illegal. If you're flying charter, or
private aircraft, different rules apply.
If the no-smoking sign was included in FSP, what would it say in the report? "9/137 passengers are currently smoking"?
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - WBHoenig - 25-12-2005
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - xvxmatthewxvx - 26-12-2005
Quote:SWAFO wrote:
That's true. I think it's not included because of the fact that on most commercial flights, smoking is illegal. If you're flying charter, or
private aircraft, different rules apply.
If the no-smoking sign was included in FSP, what would it say in the report? "9/137 passengers are currently smoking"?
I just spit out the crappy wine I was drinking!!! Its called "Fantastique"And what about if you turned off the smoking light as they were smoking? "Passengers weren't happy they couldn't finish their smoke?"
Post Edited ( 12-26-05 03:00 )
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - bomen168 - 27-12-2005
Post Edited ( 12-27-05 02:55 )
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - bomen168 - 27-12-2005
It's funny how you make humor out of airline safety Brad, as you are airline personnel yourself....
And on ALL commercial DOMESTIC flights are no smoking brad, not commercial INTERNATIONAL flights just to let you know that. In
international flights, they could care less, I mean on Singapore Airlines, they literally let the pilots smoke and then it gets recirculated into
the passenger cabin. Some food for thought...
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - WBHoenig - 27-12-2005
I come close to throwing up when someone near me smokes.
If that was still allowed on commercial flights, I'd be diving out the door at FL400. Without a chute.
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - SWAFO - 27-12-2005
Quote:bomen168 wrote:
It's funny how you make humor out of airline safety Brad, as you are airline personnel yourself....
And on ALL commercial DOMESTIC flights are no smoking brad, not commercial INTERNATIONAL flights just to let you know that. In
international flights, they could care less, I mean on Singapore Airlines, they literally let the pilots smoke and then it gets recirculated into
the passenger cabin. Some food for thought...
Keep in mind that I'm not making fun of serious safety issues. I'm simply joking around, and adding to the spirit of the post. I think you're
taking everything a little too serious bomen! I take safety as a very serious matter, as do all pilot's I know. Keep in mind that none of my
posts are to be taken as real world flying advice. They are simply for flight sim use, and can be used in any way you'd like in regards to
that.
Every International flight I've been on has been no-smoking. I've never been on a flight in which people are smoking. It's viewed as
unprofessional these days (in regards to your post about pilot's smoking), and I've never seen a pilot smoking on board an aircraft.
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - ste9889 - 08-01-2006
Quote:bomen168 wrote:Except he's not
It's funny how you make humor out of airline safety Brad, as you are airline personnel yourself....
Most if not all flights are non-smoking as i reckon the airlines could be liable if a non-smoker gets ill due to someone smoking on a flight.
All The Best
Ste
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - bomen168 - 13-01-2006
Quote:ste9889 wrote:
Except he's not
Most if not all flights are non-smoking as i reckon the airlines could be liable if a non-smoker gets ill due to someone smoking on a flight.
All The Best
Ste
HMMM.......HAS IT COME TO YOU THAT HE'S AN IMPOSTER??
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - WBHoenig - 13-01-2006
No... Never though of that...
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - bomen168 - 13-01-2006
Quote:WBHoenig wrote:
No... Never though of that...
Well then maybe you should read the blue text and go to the link on the blue text under his last post!!
Re: JUST WONDERIN... - Air France - 13-01-2006
lol