+- FsPassengers Forums (http://www.fspassengers.com/forum)
+-- Forum: FsPassengers (http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: FsPassengers Support (http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: Stupid realism versus reality question (/showthread.php?tid=6419)
Stupid realism versus reality question - Agrajag - 04-07-2006
Howdy all. Another question from the newbie....
While flying, even in VATSIM, let's be frank. It's rather common for many of us to "leave the flight deck" for a bit for any number of reasons.
Generally it's to take care of nature's calling or to get a drink, answer the phone, electrify the dog, etc. Clearly in real life we either wouldn't
leave the deck or, if we really needed to, we'd have a co-pilot there do cover the situation in our absence.
Now that I have FS Passengers with the default Emergencies of 5% set, I've been afraid to leave the deck for any reason. I'd be demoralized to leave
to grab a drink and return to find my plane has experienced some disaster.
How do emergencies work and is there a way to tell the program to, for example, pause on such a case as an option? The worst case then would be if I
were on VATSIM and my plane suddenly froze in space until I returned, but that's a trade-off I can decide on then.
Re: Stupid realism versus reality question - ivo - 04-07-2006
generally emergencies don't happen that often in cruise. If you are in cruise, you can feel free to move around. But if you are in a climb or a
descent you might experience bird strikes, gear won't lock etc.
Re: Stupid realism versus reality question - ivoryjedi - 04-07-2006
I've never encountered an fatal emergency while in cruise yet *knock on wood*. I've had them a few times on descent and once or twice on climb. You
really have to be vigilant on approach! Yesterday I was flying into YYZ in a nasty thunderstorm (had my pax fear at 30%!); i can't imagine what I
would have done if there had been a failure on that approach... "Your passengers are passing out from fear. Those still alert are throwing up in the
aisles."
Re: Stupid realism versus reality question - Turbine - 04-07-2006
I was flying on Vatsim once. Flying from KJFK to KMIA on the level-D 767 flying into KJAX airspace. Next thing I know on my gauges is engine 2
overheating. I decide to let it idle down and keep the pressure on engine 1. Next thing I know engine fire... I shut off the fuel valve I called
KJAX CTR due to having troubles keeping airspeed from dropping staying at 270. I start desending couldnt make it to KJAX knowing it was like 135nm
away. I try to land at the closest airport atc sends me too. On final about 100 feet away from the runway I couldnt control my airspeed and
everytime I increased power on engine 1 my plane would be going a different direction ofcourse that makes sense. : ) I hit the ground 100 feet away
from touchdown atleast I made a soft landing if I can remember 300-400 fpm.... : ) opps not bad for 1 engine ehh?
Re: Stupid realism versus reality question - the_nick - 04-07-2006
I just started a flight and was at 5000ft and I left for 1 hour and when I returned the airplane was still flying normally at 32000ft with no
problems , but then I checked on the passengers and the said they didn't like my dive of death and the excess of 2.02 G .
I still wonder what it was , because my engines where good hydr. press was good . etc.
Re: Stupid realism versus reality question - Vokial - 04-07-2006
I noticed that sometimes FS autopilot gets crazy and begins to dive or to bounce around the set altitude.. sometimes it gets me really angry...
Re: Stupid realism versus reality question - AKLupine - 05-07-2006
Only enroute issues I've encountered is from a window that couldn't take the pressure anymore and the noises that came with it about made me wet
myself. Once I clicked though I throttled back and pointed the nose down a lot lower than normally gets the "Dive of Death" msg from the pax and got
them back to earth safely-ISH. Departing Seattle a couple weeks ago in my trusty 732 #2 got the munchies and injested a bird but didn't die on me
right away. Made it to Juneau on the one good engine, but that situation doesn't really count as an enroute failure.
Re: Stupid realism versus reality question - Airliner - 05-07-2006
Quote:AKLupine wrote:
#2 got the munchies and injested a bird
Speaking of wetting myself...